Systematic point-count survey · Valparai plateau, Western Ghats

Twenty years of rainforest birds
across a fragmented landscape

How the bird community of 19 rainforest fragments shifted across six survey seasons between 2000 and 2019 — who rose, who declined, and what fragmentation did to forest specialists and endemics.

Mid-elevation tropical evergreen forest canopy in the Anamalai Hills, southern Western Ghats
Mid-elevation tropical evergreen rainforest canopy · Anamalai Hills, southern Western Ghats
The sampling

Six seasons, very uneven effort

Each season counted a different number of points, so raw counts can't be compared directly — every analysis below works in proportions or per-point rates to correct for it.

Each season has a single observer (2000–2004 one observer, 2005 another, 2019 a third), so observer identity and year are confounded — keep that in mind when reading any trend.
Correcting for effort

Rarefaction: was 2019 really the richest year?

Raw species counts reward whoever counted more birds. Rarefaction rebuilds each season's expected richness as if only the same number of individuals had been sampled, so the seasons become directly comparable. Each curve is one season; the dashed line marks the common sample size all are compared at.

The reversal

Counted raw, 2019 led with 106 species — but it also logged 10,354 individuals, ten times the smallest season. Rarefied to a common 1,042 birds, 2000 is the most diverse season (82 species) and 2019 falls to mid-pack (~78). The apparent richness gain was a sampling artefact.

Bars show rarefied richness ± standard deviation at 1,042 individuals. 2003 has no error bar because its whole sample equals the common size.
Community composition

The community is getting top-heavy

Each band is a species' share of all individuals counted that season. The "all other species" pool — every bird outside the 12 commonest — shrank from 55% to 36%, meaning a handful of abundant generalists now dominate.

Species explorer

Track any species across the years

Pick a species to see its share of the community, its occupancy (the % of survey points where it turned up), and how many individuals were counted each season.

or jump to: White-eye ↑ Barbet ↓ Hill Myna
Ecological guilds

Endemics slipping, generalists holding

Tracking three signatures of forest health over time: Western Ghats endemics, rainforest specialists vs open-country birds, and the seasonal influx of migrants. The slow erosion of the endemic share is the line to watch.

Endemic share Forest vs open-country Resident vs migrant
Island biogeography

Forest birds need space — open-country birds don't

The species–area relationship, split by habitat. Each bubble is a fragment (bubble size = survey effort), placed by area on a log scale. Rainforest specialists climb steeply with fragment size, while open-country birds run the opposite way — small, edge-dominated patches actually hold more of them. The two trend lines cross, and that divergence is the fingerprint of fragmentation.

Heat maps

Where the birds are

Two views. First, an occupancy matrix — every species against every fragment, coloured by the share of points in that fragment where the species turned up. Scroll the species axis to explore all 130. Then a spatial grid for any single species, built from the 732 GPS-tagged survey points of the 2019 season.

Spatial heat map for:
Only the 2019 season has per-point coordinates, so spatial maps are 2019 only. Each cell sums the individuals counted within that patch of the landscape; empty cells had no detections of that species.
Small vs large patches

Does patch size change who lives there?

Splitting the fragments at the median area (100 ha) into small and large groups, and comparing the share of endemics, forest specialists and migrants in each, across every season.

Endemic % Forest specialist % Migrant %
Effort and habitat differ between the two groups as well as size, so treat this as descriptive contrast rather than a controlled experiment.